|
Originals posted by Carlyle Smith CSEZ Enterprises Wilmington, DE Here is a way to test your 30-pin 1Mb SIMMs to see if they will work in your IBM MCA caching SCSI adapter. I found some in my junk SIMM bag that are now working fine in my XP95 machine, The key is to find 1Mb SIMMs that have pins 24 and 26 shorted to ground (pin 9 or 22). These will work in the adapter. This newsgroup prevoiusly reported that the adapter cache could be upgraded from 512 Kb to 2 Mb by replacing the 256Kb SIMMs with 1 Mb matched SIMMs. However, it was said that only IBM SIMMs of the type used in the PS/2 Models 25 and 30 would work; that industry standard 30-pin 1 Mb SIMMs would not work. Not wanting to pay $20 or more for a pair of IBM branded modules, I thought I would check out if I had any 30-pin SIMMs that would satisfy the bootup cache testing cycle of PS/2 Models 90 and 95. Table I. below shows the comparison of standard pin assignments as compared to the IBM module design. It is clear that if one has an FET VOM (low probe voltage, less than 5 VDC), you can test SIMMs you might have laying around to see if they could be used, instead of paying large dollars for the almost non-existent SIMMs recycled from early PS/2s. **With care, you don't even need a Field Effect Transistor VOM, nor a digital VOM, only an old-style direct battery VOM, as long as the probe voltage is 5 VDC or less. Table II.
identifies the SIMMS that I tested.
Table III. shows the results of testing the SIMMs in the SCSI adapter in a Model 95. It is clear that if you probe pin 24 of a module, and find it connected to ground (pin 22), the module may work in the SCSI adapter. If pins 22 and 24 are not connected, it surely won't. If it is a 1Mb SIMM and pins 24 and 26 are both grounded to pin 22, it will work in the cache slot with no problem. **At about a buck a module, you're not risking much to test the SIMM. Again, if there is no contact between pin 22 (ground in _all_ 256Kb and 1 Mb 30-pin SIMMs), that is, if the resistance is infinite, don't go any farther. The SIMM is _not_ compatible with the IBM caching SCSI controller. I also found that I could take one of the Toshiba 1Mb modules and one of the OKI 1 Mb modules, and the machine booted up with no problems. This probably would not be a good idea for the long haul, but might be useful to get the adapter working in a pinch. Comments? Have fun! Table 1. SIMM Pin Assignment Differences
RAS1= Row Address Strobe 1 CAS = Column Address Strobe In both types: Pins 9 and 22 are Grounded Pins 1 and 30 are +5 VDC Table II. Identification of SIMM Modules Tested:
Table III. Module Test Results Matrix
**Comments added 2/3/99 Parts 5 and 7 above have been working fine in both FCC ID ANO6451018 (CARD 4) and FCC ID ANOSPRIME FRU 85F0063 (CARD 2) caching controllers for some time. Actually, I did the testing back in September, and reconfirmed the operation in mid-January. Perhaps you could check out some generic SIMMs and find them quite workable/useful. The ones who will benefit are those who are operating on a limited budget (therwise known as PS/2 addicts) and who need to spend their bucks in more important areas. Editors Note- Like Pizza and Jolt Cola... 8550 as
a Source?
I had to repair one for a guy, and found that it had two 512 Mb 30-pin SIMMs in it. The chips are identical to those found on one version of the 256 Kb SIMM normally used on the adapter, except both sides of the ckt board are populated, each with nine 256 Kbit chips. Of course, this precludes using _them_ in the cache slots, because the pins on the backside interfere with leaning them back into the retainer clips. However, looking into the specs for the 8550, the max memory on the mainboard was 2 Mb -- that is, two 1 Mb SIMMs in place of the 512 Kb SIMMs. So check your old Model 50s for some IBM-specific modules. Forget the 50Z -- it used one 72-pin module, not two 30-pin modules. Checking the 256Kb, the 512Kb, and the 1 Mb IBM SIMMs, the Presence Detect pin grounding table looks like this:
where the continuity between pins 24 and 26 versus pin 22 are measured. This fills the logic out nicely. Did anybody other than IBM make 512 Kb SIMMs?? |
